In order to define the word
“literacy”, the author use the word “discourse” as a “identity kit” to explain
and help us to understand “literacy”. Because the author thinks that there is a
strong connection between the discourse and literacy.
Firstly, form the author's view discourse
means “the appropriate costume and instructions on how to act and talk so as to
take a particular role that others will recognize”. (Gee P 257) Discourse includes
primary discourse and secondary discourse.
After that the author shows five deeper points about what discourse is and what
qualities discourse has.
Then author points out that
literacy in some parts is like discourse, literacy is the control of secondary
discourse. By making a level of
using language such as first use of language and secondary use of language
authors point out her ideas that “literacy is control of secondary uses of
language” which means literacy is not just basic skill of understanding and
speaking, it should be in a higher level and used in a formal condition. Author also shows an argument about
whether leaning view is better or acquisition view is better. She points out
that acquisition view is a better way for studying however we always study more
throughout the learning view. In the end of debate, she provides how this two ways
work in real world. She concludes that we always use both ways to study and transfer from this way to another in different condition. In the end of
the article, as a linguists, the author exhibit some suggestions about learning
an acquisition a language.
No comments:
Post a Comment